Saturday, October 19, 2013

Shadws of Vietnam all over again: WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST: Left Behind

WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST


Image_7.jpg
MUNIR UZ ZAMAN, AFP/GETTY IMAGES

U.S. Army soldiers patrol near Baraki Barak base in Afghanistan’s Logar province on Oct. 11, 2012.

LEFT BEHIND

Image_8.jpg
BASSAM HASHEM Military in­terpreter Bassam Ha­shem, right, and Capt. Brian En­glund attend an American vs. Iraqi soc­cer game at Shaab Na­tional Stadi­um in Bagh­dad in 2009.
Afghan and Iraqi interpreters who risked everything for U.S. troops fear for their lives while hanging on to hope for a fresh start in the USA


Jabeen Bhatti http://rochesterdemocrat.ny.newsmemory.com/
Special for USA TODAY
AMMAN , JORDAN Iraqi interpret­er Bassam Hashem was having lunch with colleagues at the Loy­alty Camp in Baghdad, a U.S. mili­tary base, when an Iraqi colonel in the federal police force turned toward them from the next table.
“ ‘We will get you when the Americans leave,’ he told us,” said Hashem, 29, noting the colonel was at the camp to receive train­ing. “And he was laughing. ‘We will get you all,’ ” he said.
Mohammad Janis Shinwari’s warning came scratched on his car. “Your judgment day is com­ing,” was the message to Shinwa­ri, 36, who said the Taliban has been looking to get him for years.
“They know I saved a U.S. in­telligence officer’s life and have killed Taliban,” he said. “They are trying hard to find me – it’s just a matter of time.”
Two countries, two conflicts and one common fate shared by thousands of Iraqis and Afghans such as Shinwari and Hashem: Because they worked with the U.S. military, they are marked men by militants.
The United States has long been aware of the danger such men put themselves in by helping the Americans. So it created a special visa for them to come to work and live in the USA once their assignment was up. Instead of receiving the visas they have been promised, they have become snared in a bureaucratic tangle that has forced them into hiding while they wait for approval.
Kirk Johnson of the group List Project to Resettle Iraqi Allies, said the U.S. visa system for inter­preters is a web of delays in which no one is held responsible.
The process is designed to re­ject them or make them wait,” said Johnson, author of To Be a Friend is Fatal: The Fight to Save the Iraqis America Left Behind . “It is as low a moment as it gets for both the Iraqis and Afghans.”
The U.S. State Department said it understands the threat faced by local hires that work for the U.S. government in both countries, but those concerns must be bal­anced with protecting national security.
“We take these threats, and the concerns of those who work with us, very seriously, and we are committed to providing them with the benefits for which they are legally eligible,” State respon­ded in an e-mailed statement. But “we need to be sure that those who wish to do us harm are not able to take advantage of the program.”
The State Department insists it has improved wait times for re­sponses to requests for the spe­cial visas. If so, critics say, it is not good enough.
TIME IS NOT ON THEIR SIDE
Of the 25,000 visas allocated by law to Iraqis who worked for the U.S. government, fewer than 6,000 have been issued since 2008, according to Katherine Re­isner, national policy director of the Iraqi Refugee Assistance Pro­ject at the Urban Justice Center in New York City. Of the 8,750 available for Afghans, fewer than 1,200 have been granted.
Thousands of these Iraqi and Afghan hires deal with escalating violence in their countries while the visa process, when it works, can take upward of four years.
The program for Iraqis expired Sept. 30 but was granted a 90-day extension last week and is due to be extended again for a year. The Afghan program expires next September.
Johnson was among those who lobbied Congress to establish the special visa programs. When they became law, he said, he was thrilled that America had recog­nized an obligation to interpreters.
“I never imagined that five years later, we would be looking at the expiration of the program with so many unused visas and an even worse predicament for the Afghans,” he said. “And when you look at the number of Iraqi cases still left to process, it would take 17 years to dole out those remain­ing visas at the rate we have been g oing.”
Some members of Congress have tried to push the issue, sometimes pressuring State on particular cases, but Congress cannot overrule a process that is the authority of the State Department.
Hashem knew from the begin­ning that it would be dangerous to work with the Americans. But there was little work in Baghdad, and he lacked connections to get the few jobs available, so he de­cided to respond to the pleas from the U.S. military for help from locals.
DEATH STALKS THEM
He was hired as a translator and began working in January 2009. He worried about becoming a tar­get for the well-armed Shiite mi­litias that lurked in most Baghdad neighborhoods. He took precau­tions. He avoided the five-minute walk to his mother’s house from the camp and instead took taxis to distant parts of the city in a roundabout journey home that took three hours but would lose anyone following him.
“The local militias have their eyes on who is going in and out of the camps, fol­lowing the Iraqis that work there, kid­napping and killing some of those peo­ple,” he said. Six months after he started the job, an elderly neighbor who has regular con­tact with the Shiite militias warned his mother: “We know your son is working with the Americans — your son and your family will be killed.”
His family left for Jordan a week later. Hashem stayed be­hind and lived at the camp, where he was safe. Until April 2010, when he lost his job and needed release papers or a transfer order from the mili­tary to work at another unit. He waited for three weeks, hiding at the homes of friends until he could get out and to Jordan, where he waits for the visa he ap­plied for in March 2010.
He received a preliminary ap­proval a year later to his delight, but the visa was revoked with no explanation in late 2011.
“I was devastated,” he said. “I thought, they must have made a mistake.”
He blames the arrests in 2011 in Kentucky of two Iraqis granted refugee status who were caught trying to send weapons to insur­gents in Iraq. As a result, all Iraqi ap­plicants are under deeper scrutiny, he suspects. Johnson said he has often hectored U.S. officials at State and Homeland Se­curity about stalled visas and is told the delay is due to secu­rity concerns.
“But the truth is, when we have want­ed to help high-pri­ority refugees in the past, the only time that happens is if the American presi­dent is involved,” he said. “If he doesn’t provide cover, no bureaucrat is going to stick their neck out or act with any urgency.”
‘HONOR-BOUND’ TO ACT
Some of the interpreters stuck their necks out for Americans, as Matt Zeller can attest.
The former CIA intelligence officer and U.S. Army captain was serving in Afghanistan in April 2008 when his unit came under attack by a group of Taliban fight­ers in Ghazni province.
Zeller said he was pinned down when Shinwari came running up from the rear, firing his AK-47. Shinwari killed two militants and saved Zeller’s life.
He said he spends a great deal of time trying to return the favor — calling members of Congress, State Department officials, the news media, everyone he can think of to pressure consular offi­cials to get Shinwari his visa.
“These people haven’t been among these people, living on the local economy. They haven’t served in combat. They don’t know what it means when some­one saves your life,” he said of State Department officials he blames for stalling Shinwari’s case. “I am honor-bound to do whatever I can to save him and his family.”
Shinwari applied for his visa in 2011, but his situation took on a new urgency after it was an­nounced that his unit would withdraw in October and the in­terpreters would lose their jobs. After months of lobbying and putting together a petition signed by more than 100,000 people, Shinwari was granted permission Sept. 8 to emigrate.
A few days later, the visa was revoked.
The State Department, which said it cannot comment by law on a specific case, said it has a right to revoke visas, “based on infor­mation that comes to light at any time.”
Zeller said that is “insane.”
“They are hiding behind rea­sons of national security, but that is an insult to the entire process. This guy had been signed off by everyone, CIA, Defense, you name it,” Zeller said.
“Afghans just shake their head and say, ‘You have put a person on the moon. How is it possible that you can’t process some pa­perwork,’ ” said Marine Lt. Col. Ty Edwards, who had been trying to get his interpreter out since 2009. Edwards was shot in the head and nearly died in 2008 af­ter an ambush by the Taliban in Kunar province. What saved him, he said, were the actions of his in­terpreter, who shielded him from gunfire.
“A lot of interpreters wouldn’t have saved my life, but he did, and we owe him,” said Edwards, 45, of Tampa, who is partially paralyzed and in a wheelchair as a result of his wounds.
After intense pressure, Ed­wards said, his interpreter finally received a call from the U.S. Em­bassy in late September to come in for processing — four years af­ter he applied for the special visa for interpreters. He got a call last week telling him he had been ap­proved.
Now he waits and hopes noth­ing goes wrong.
Retired Marine major general Jarvis Lynch, who visits Edwards weekly and has been helping to push his interpreter’s case, said it is important that Americans re­member the lessons of the past and do the right thing.
“This is what we did to the Vietnamese who had cooperated with us and did what we asked them to — we basically aban­doned (many of ) them to re-edu­cation camps and/or death,” said Lynch, who served in Vietnam. “We shouldn’t have a repeat of that grievous sin.”
Image_1.jpg
MATT ZELLER
Mohammad Janis Shinwari, right, with an Afghan police offi­cer, served with the U.S. military in Afghanistan for seven years. He is in hiding from the Taliban as he waits on the U.S. consulate to decide on his visa status.
Image_3.jpg
TY EDWARDS
Marine Lt. Col. Ty Ed­wards, right, served with an Afghan company commander in 2008 at Camp Keat­ing. Edwards says an Af­ghan inter­preter saved his life in a battle against the Taliban.

Image_2.jpg
JACK GRUBER, USA TODAY
“They are hiding behind reasons of national security, but that is an insult to the entire process.”
Matt Zeller, former CIA officer

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Holger Awakens: Can America Blow the Minds of the NSA?

Holger Awakens: Can America Blow the Minds of the NSA?





Question:


What would happen if roughly 200 million Americans "cc'd" the NSA email address on each and every email that they send?

Maybe we should give it a try, huh?
 

Monday, July 1, 2013

Think America: WHAT DOES AMERICA NEED?

Think America: WHAT DOES AMERICA NEED?: Ask anyone this question and you might get as many different answers as the number of people you ask, but one thing that every thinking Ame... http://thinkamericamd.blogspot.com/2013/06/what-does-america-need.html

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

INFILTRATED NATION: 1.4 MILLION Gang Members And More Pour Into The Un...

INFILTRATED NATION: 1.4 MILLION Gang Members And More Pour Into The Un...: Conservative Papers A vast army of heavily armed criminals has embedded itself in every major city in the United States. In fact, nea...

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Crows

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120110/NEWS01/201100321/-1/7daysarchives/Rochester-crows-Richards-health




Crows, posted with vodpod

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Calmly Targeted Drivers and People While Shouting Allahu Akbar!

NO ONE IS REPORTING THIS PART OF THE STORY!!!
What is most disturbing about this story, apart from the obvious horror, is that not one news account reported what one witness said the shooter was screaming: “allahu akbar.” Not one news account. The media is the enemy.
Check out the video here. One of the witnesses states that the shooter was repeatedly shouting “allahu akbar” at minute 2:42. This video is on the bottom right of the LA Times new story, but they don’t mention it in their coverage — neither does Reuters, CBS news, The Hollywood Reporter, KFAI, or any of the other news reports. I expect that this video will be removed or edited.
Hollywood shootout: Gunman calmly targeted drivers, pedestrians LA Times blog (hat tip her royal whyness)

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Sgt David Lemcke returns home: After more than 40 years

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20111110/NEWS01/111100321/David-Lemcke-Hilton-soldier-remains Sgt David Lemcke returns home: More than 40 years after U.S. Army Sgt. David Earl Lemcke of Hilton was killed in a bunker explosion in Vietnam, his remains came home on Wednesday, November 9, 2011. Video story by Annette Lein




Sgt David Lemcke returns home: After more than ..., posted with vodpod

Monday, October 17, 2011

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Thursday, August 25, 2011

We all know who broke the circle of peace on 9/11

Crescent memorial to Flight 93 opens on 9/11 and we are fighting!

Mr. Burnett and I emailed some of you last September but this is our first time contacting the entire list (almost 7,000 now). We thought you might like to see the first in a series of newspaper advertisements we are running as the 10th anniversary of 9/11 approaches.

Asked by a reporter for his comments on some new design images, Mr. Burnett explained that all the terrorist memorializing features are still there. They call it a broken circle now, but the unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is just the original Crescent of Embrace: a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, still pointing to Mecca.

According to the reporter, her editors instructed her not to print Mr. Burnett’s remarks, so we decided to   publish them ourselves  , along with graphics of how the design remains unchanged, and a flyer people can post demanding to know WHO is being depicted as breaking the circle of peace on 9/11.

Everyone knows who actually broke the peace. It was a wolf-pack of Muslim terrorists, which means that the circle-breaking crescent-creating theme of the memorial can only be depicting the actions of the terrorists. Not only are the terrorists seen to smash our circle of peace, but they are also shown as leaving a giant Islamic crescent-and-star flag in its place. A more obvious tribute to Islamic terrorism is hard to imagine.
On the 9/11 anniversary the Obamas will be in Somerset Pennsylvania for the opening of the memorial, so this is the time and place to hit. If we can raise the necessary funding, we plan to buy six different ad-runs. A very generous soul has offered to match all   donations up to a total of $5000. All help is much appreciated! Mr. Burnett and I are each pitching in a thousand, and if we can get to the full ten, I believe we can have a serious impact.

In addition to the print ads, we also have a large network of online supporters who will plaster our advertising campaign across the web. As Flight 93 showed, just because a hijacker has control of the cockpit doesn’t mean he can’t still be stopped.

“We’re going to do something,” said Tom Burnett Junior, and our little group is trying hard to follow suit.

Many thanks to all of you,

Alec Rawls, Palo Alto CA
Tom Burnett Senior, Northfield MN  http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/

We all know who broke the circle of peace on 9/11

It was 19 Islamic terrorists. That makes the broken-circle memorial to Flight 93 a memorial to the terrorists, who are depicted not only as smashing our circle of peace, but as leaving a giant Islamic crescent-and-star flag in its place:
Photobucket
They call it a broken circle now, but the unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is just the original Crescent of Embrace: a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, pointing to Mecca.
The damned thing is actually an al Qaeda victory mosque, with the Mecca-oriented crescent as its mihrab: the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built.

That is the short version of an advertisement that started running in western Pennsylvania newspapers last week. Alec Rawls sends along this update on the effort to stop the crescent mosque.

10th anniversary ad campaign now underway
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review recently solicited Tom Burnett Senior’s response to some new design images for the Flight 93 memorial. When he said that the so-called redesign leaves all of the terrorist memorializing features intact, editors instructed reporter Kari Andren to leave his remarks out. They preferred un-interrupted praise from the same few family members who always speak up for the broken-circle design.

The people of Pennsylvania deserve to see what their information gate-keepers don’t want them to know, so Mr. Burnett and his backers decided to begin their 10th anniversary ad campaign a few weeks early. The first full-page color ad just ran in the Somerset Daily American and will appear in two other local papers next week.

For a PDF of the ad copy, click on the thumbnail below, or scroll down for the same content formatted for browsing. If anyone wants to help fund additional advertising, a very generous soul has offered to match all donations up to a total of $5000.
Broken circle ad 1, large thumbnail
More explicit than a giant Islamic crescent-and-star flag?
As the ad-headline notes, the Circle of Embrace “redesign” only accentuates the circle-breaking crescent-creating theme of the original Crescent of Embrace. Mr. Burnett’s full remarks explain:
The only visible change is the addition of an extra arc of trees that explicitly represents a broken off part of the circle. The unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is just the original Crescent of Embrace: a giant Islamic shaped crescent, still pointing to Mecca.
People also need to know that a Mecca-direction indicator is the central feature around which every mosque is built. It is called a “mihrab,” and the classic mihrab is crescent shaped.
So the terrorists broke our circle of peace on 9/11, and all that remains standing is the central feature of a mosque. The inclusion of a broken-off part of the circle only accentuates this terrorist-memorializing symbolism. It bastardizes what my son Tom and the other heroes of Flight 93 accomplished. The crescent/broken-circle design is a desecration of sacred ground.
Tom Burnett Sr. Northfield MN
Park Service calls the circle “broken”
A proper newspaper would ask the Park Service if the extra arc of trees really does represent a broken-off part of the circle. Still, people can easily verify this crucial fact for themselves. It is right on the Park Service’s own website. Their “questions about the design” page asks “Is this circle ‘broken’ at all?” Their answer is yes:
… the circle is symbolically “broken” or missing trees in two places, depicting the flight path of the plane, and the crash site.
The locations of these two breaks in the “circle of embrace” are spelled out:
…first, where the flight path of the plane went overhead (which is the location of the planned memorial overlook and visitor center), and second, where the plane crashed at the Sacred Ground (depicted by a ceremonial gate and pathway into the Sacred Ground).
These are the two ends of the extra arc of trees, which starts near the original upper crescent tip and continues down to the crash site. So Mr. Burnett is right. Both ends of the new arc of trees are explicitly broken off. The unbroken part of the circle—what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11—is just the original Islamic-shaped Crescent of Embrace that the Park Service promised to change.

To illustrate, the ad includes a side-bar of graphics, showing just what is changed and what is not changed in the memorial. This is slightly complicated by the fact that the Park Service pretended that they were going to make one very big cosmetic change that they are not actually making, but a few pictures easily tell the tale.
The Park Service pretended the outside of the crescent would be filled in with a forest of trees
A publicity shot of the original Crescent of Embrace design shows what appears to be a bare-naked Islamic crescent-and-star flag planted atop the crash site:
Crescent of Embrace publicity shot
When this blatant Islamic symbolism caused an uproar, architect Paul Murdoch re-worked his mock-up to show a forest of additional trees surrounding the outside of the original Crescent:
Circle/Bowl of Embrace publicity shot
Only the inner arc of the crescent remains visible, making the new Circle of Embrace name seem reasonable. But none of these surrounding trees made it into the actual Circle of Embrace design drawings. (The “Stage 1″ drawings, encompassing the area seen in these images, were released in 2009.)
The Park Service may eventually let the bare field grow in with trees, but this is not a change in the design. The only actual change is the extra arc of trees, seen below in orange. It explicitly represents a broken off part of the circle:
What Circle of Embrace will actually look like
What the Circle of Embrace actually looks like. The original giant crescent still sits naked on an open field and the flight path still “breaks the circle” at the upper crescent tip.

Remove the explicitly broken off part of the circle (in orange), and what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11 is the same giant Mecca-oriented crescent the Park Service promised to change. It constitutes a classic “mihrab,” the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built, and will form the centerpiece for the world’s largest mosque.

Who broke the circle of peace on 9/11?
When the “Crescent of Embrace” was unveiled as the winning design, architect Paul Murdoch explained the crescent name and the crescent shape by saying that the circle was broken on 9/11, leaving only a part of the circle still standing: the giant crescent. The fact that this circle-breaking crescent-creating theme remains completely intact in the broken-circle design demands the question of WHO is being depicted as breaking the circle of peace on 9/11.

The final section of the ad points out that there can only be one answer. We all know who broke the peace on 9/11. Thus the memorial can only be depicting the actions of the terrorists, who are seen not only as smashing our circle of peace, but as replacing it with their own crescent and star flag.
With the media censoring all criticism, people who don’t like all this blatant Islamic symbolism need a way to signal each other directly, so the ad finishes with a handy dandy flyer that readers can post on windows, walls, bulletin boards etcetera:
Who broke the circle, click for PDF
If you want to put a few up yourself, click the image above for a printable PDF, complete with urls for our petition to stop the memorial and for more information. And here is an ad-copy version that anyone can run in their own local paper (the free weeklies can be pretty reasonable).

As Flight 93 showed, just because the hijacker has control of the cockpit doesn’t mean he can’t still be stopped.

I’d like to see a list of names of anyone who came up with the design for the memorial.
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous : 11:54 AM


Here’s contact information for the architect of the “Crescent of Embrace”

CONTACT
Paul Murdoch Architects
Office Address
8820 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 330
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Phone
310.358.0993 Office
310.358.9196 Fax


# posted by Anonymous Anonymous : 2:39 PM
here are two articles to read for more info on the memorial:

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Obama Campaign Advisor Gibbs

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/robert-gibbs-cracks-rick-perry-birther-joke-on-msnbc/
Robert Gibbs Cracks Rick Perry Birther Joke on MSNBC




Obama Campaign Advisor Gibbs, posted with vodpod

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Dan Savage: ‘I Wish [Republicans] Were All F–king Dead’

Appearing on HBO's "Real Time" with Bill Maher, the syndicated columnist expresses his deepest desires for Republicans.

This is the same man who claimed to lick the doorknobs of Gary Bauer's campaign offices in 2000 so that the staff could catch his flu.
http://www.breitbart.tv/dan-savage-i-wish-republicans-were-all-f-king-dead/




Dan Savage: ‘I Wish [Republicans] Were All F–ki..., posted with vodpod

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Obama 'shafes' at unscripted questions! NO CAMERAS!

A long-running tiff between the White House press corps and the West Wing over presidential access flared anew today when press secretary Jay Carney faced off with reporters over the right to shout questions at the president during debt talks.

Obama chafes at the time-honored practice of answering questions shouted at him during pooled, non-press conference events — and his staff has often opted for “stills sprays,” excluding print reporters or TV cameras who might capture Obama in the less than flattering non-act of snubbing a query.

When asked today why TV crews and print reporters were barred from the pool covering the White House meeting with congressional leaders on the deficit, Carney responded by pointing out that the administration has held two press conferences in the past two weeks and allowed TV cameras into the spray earlier this week.

"People shouted questions at him," Carney added.

Read More: http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/0711/shout_of_bounds_729191ad-6922-4221-8711-77a68d3802df.html




Obama 'chafes' at unscripted question, NO CAMERAS!, posted with vodpod

Search Rape At Rochester, NY Airport

New Port Richey couple says TSA search went too far
New Port Richey, Florida - Airport security is a part of traveling these days, from walking through X-Ray machines to being patted down. But one New Port Richey couple contacted 10 News to say the search they received went too far.

"It was extremely thorough, almost a violation, "says Jason Steitler as he describes how a TSA official searched him at the Greater Rochester International Airport July 6th. Steitler's disability requires he uses a wheelchair.

"They did the hair then did the neck. Then they had me do a pushup in my chair, then got down into my inner thigh around my back side. It's the most thorough search [I've] had done in my life," says Steitler.

Steitler and his wife, Jennifer, were heading home to New Port Richey that morning. She too is in a wheel chair and was searched by a TSA official.

"She's been using the phrase 'search raped' because it was that thorough. She says it was nearly to her crotch," says Steitler. "I feel the chair should have option of either scanner or searches, but automatically we're being thrown to being patted down."

Steitler says they've complained to the TSA about their experience at Rochester International Airport, but all they've received back is a standard form letter.

"Just the standard reply to everything: 'In order to fly you have to be searched,'" says Steitler.

In an email to the Steitlers, a TSA official writes, "We apologize for any insensitivity or inappropriate treatment you experienced during the screening process."

In another email, a TSA official says, "We believe these security measures are necessary and appropriate for ensuring the security and confidence of all air travelers."

The Steitlers say they are not opposed to the searches, just the way the disabled are treated when it's done. Steitler says, "Generally, be fair about it. Don't hold the disabled up to more scrutiny just because they are in chairs."

Noah Lebowitz, the director of communications for Monroe County and spokesperson for Greater Rochester International Airport, tells 10 News in a written statement, "The Greater Rochester International Airport always strives to provide outstanding customer service to our passengers and ensure that they enjoy a convenient and safe travel experience. The security screening protocols in question are the jurisdiction of the federal government through the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). If any passenger believes that our airport could have provided them with an enhanced customer experience, we encourage them to contact us."

Steitler says he plans to become an advocate for the disabled until he feels the security protocol is fair and equal for all.
http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/article/200788/250/New-Port-Richey-couple-says-TSA-search-went-too-far




Search rape at Rochester, NY airport, posted with vodpod